A positivie game development in my opinion! Nice insights Ernst.
This rule variation makes the contest fairer for defenders trying to contest a shot on goal received as an aerial, and makes interpretation simpler for the umpires!
Agreed, though I'm still not happy. How would you rewrite the rules so players can safely intercept any aerial without any distance between them and opponents, that would still allow for a consistent way of making the call if someone makes it dangerous?
A positivie game development in my opinion! Nice insights Ernst.
This rule variation makes the contest fairer for defenders trying to contest a shot on goal received as an aerial, and makes interpretation simpler for the umpires!
Everybody wins ✔️
Agreed, though I'm still not happy. How would you rewrite the rules so players can safely intercept any aerial without any distance between them and opponents, that would still allow for a consistent way of making the call if someone makes it dangerous?
To simplify further ‘playing distance’ could be removed from the rule leaving it simply to be judged on danger.
I believe consistency is basically impossible when interpreting aerial scenarios - An unachievable goal.